At the time Madison worked on The Constitution, the population gap between small and large states was relatively minor. It was an agricultural economy, with the population spread out amongst the states. But times and population densities have changed drastically since then, especially with the growth of major metropolitan areas. And whereas Madison envisioned each House member representing a roughly equal number of citizens (the electoral College math is based on House representation), today the limit of 435 members leads to some districts holding far more citizens than those in other states, skewing the numbers that lead to Electoral College vote counts by state.
Is it time to abolish the Electoral College, or is it still just as relevant today as it was then?
I am glad to read this info.
Should we abolish the Electoral College? The answer is No. The United States is a republic of states joined together to form a federal government. Without an electoral college to select the one national office, that of president and vice president, we would no longer be a republic of states but a unitary government. The electoral college is not the problem. Winner take all election to the EC is the problem. It is unfair to award all of the EC votes to a candidate who just barely wins the popular vote of a state. A system that awards EC votes from a state by proportional representation would be much fairer and represent the will of the people and also the will of the states in federal elections.
Any individual who is intrigued to apply in partition getting ready can do everything on the web. This outfits the candidate with the opportunity to pick when or how the individual will apply. Read this article. You can get to the school's objectives any place through your cell phone.
Satisfied to see that you are in the end making a record that would take out the obvious setting of a mixing entertainer. I consistently visit to do what needs to be done on time. I would watch it.